1/14/04 1/14/04

Discourse cues that respondents have misunderstood survey questions

Schober, Michael F.; Bloom, Jonathan E. (2004). Discourse Processes38(3), 287-308. [LINK] [request]

1/30/03 1/30/03

How web surveys differ from other kinds of user interfaces

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G.; Ehlen, Patrick; Fricker, Scott S. (2003). Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods [LINK]

1/15/03 1/15/03

Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner

Schober, Michael F.; Brennan, Susan E. (2003). In Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [LINK] [request]

1/9/02 1/9/02

A collaborative view of standardized survey interviews

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2002). In Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (pp. 67-94). New York: John Wiley & Sons. [LINK] [request]

1/10/01 1/10/01

Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender

Bortfeld, Heather; Leon, Silvia D.; Brennan, Susan E.; Bloom, Jonathan E.; Schober, Michael F. (2001). Language and Speech44(2), 123-149. [LINK] [request]

1/10/01 1/10/01

Readers' varying interpretations of theme in short fiction

Kurtz, Victoria; Schober, Michael F. (2001). Poetics29(3), 139-166. [LINK] [request]

1/9/01 1/9/01

How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech

Brennan, Susan E.; Schober, Michael F. (2001). Journal of Memory and Language 44(2), 274-296. [LINK] [request]

1/4/00 1/4/00

Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F. (2000). Public Opinion Quarterly64(1), 1-28. [LINK] [request]

1/14/99 1/14/99

How beliefs about a partner’s goals affect referring in goal-discrepant conversations

Russell, Alex W.; Schober, Michael F. (1999). Discourse Processes,27(1), 1-33. [LINK] [request]

1/6/99 1/6/99

Making sense of questions: An interactional approach

Schober, Michael F. (1999). In Cognition and survey research (pp. 77-93). New York: John Wiley & Sons. [LINK] [request]

Michael Schober 8/5/98 Michael Schober 8/5/98

How addressees affect spatial perspective choice in dialogue

Schober, Michael F. (1998). How addressees affect spatial perspective choice in dialogue. In P.L. Olivier & K.-P. Gapp (Eds.), Representation and processing of spatial expressions (pp. 231-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [LINK] [request]

1/6/98 1/6/98

Different kinds of conversational perspective-taking

Schober, Michael F. (1998). In Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 145-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [LINK] [Request]

1/2/98 1/2/98

Conversational evidence for rethinking meaning

Schober, Michael F. (1998). Social Research65(3), 511-534. [LINK] [request]

1/16/97 1/16/97

Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error?

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (1997). Public Opinion Quarterly 61(4) [LINK]

Michael Schober 8/7/96 Michael Schober 8/7/96

Addressee- and object-centered frames of reference in spatial descriptions

Schober, M.F. (1996). In P.L. Olivier (Ed.), Cognitive & computational models of spatial representation: Papers from the 1996 AAAI Spring Symposium (pp. 92-100). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press. [LINK]

1/27/95 1/27/95

Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations?

Schober, Michael F. (1995). Discourse Processes20(2), 219-247. [LINK] [request]

1/21/93 1/21/93

Spatial perspective-taking in conversation

Schober, Michael F. (1993). Cognition47(1), 1-24. [LINK] [request]

6/13/92 6/13/92

Asking questions and influencing answers

Clark, Herbert H.; Schober, Michael F. (1992). In Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys, (pp. 15-48). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [LINK] [Request] [Download]

3/31/89 3/31/89

Understanding by addressees and overhearers

Schober, Michael F.; Clark, Herbert H. (1989). Cognitive Psychology21(2) [LINK] [request]