Conceptual Misalignment

Featured
New methods for measuring shared and divergent visitor experience: A pilot study at the Royal College of Music Museum

Spiro, Neta; Harkness, A.C.; Rigamonti, Arianna.; Rossi Rognoni, Gabriele; Schober, Michael F. (in press). Proceedings of ASPIRE – The Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 69th Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Misunderstanding stance in tweets

Dolgin, Rebecca S.; Calbi, Simone L.; Huang, Jeffrey W.; Schober, Michael F. (in press). Discourse Processes. [LINK]

Clarifying question meaning in standardized interviews can improve data quality even though wording may change: A review of the evidence

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F. (2021). InternationalJournal of Social Research Methodology24(2), 203-226 [LINK] [request]

The future of face-to-face interviewing

Schober, Michael F. (2018). Quality Assurance in Education26(2), 293-302 [LINK] [request]

When do misunderstandings matter? Evidence from survey interviews about smoking

Schober, Michael F.; Suessbrick, Anna L.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2018). Topics in Cognitive Science10(2), 452-482 [LINK] [request]

What about their performance do free jazz improvisers agree upon? A case study

Pras, Amandine; Schober, Michael F.; Spiro, Neta (2017). Frontiers in Psychology (8) [LINK]

Listeners' and performers' shared understanding of jazz improvisations

Schober, Michael F.; Spiro, Neta (2016). Frontiers in Psychology (7) [LINK]

Improving social measurement by understanding interaction in survey interviews

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2015). Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences2(1), 211-219 [LINK] [request]

Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F.; Jans, Matt; Orlowski, Rachel A.; Nielsen, Daniel; Levenstein, Rachel (2015). Frontiers in Psychology, 6 [LINK]

Jazz improvisers' shared understanding: A case study

Schober, Michael F.; Spiro, Neta (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 5 [LINK]

Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: Executive summary of the AAPOR Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research

Link, Michael W.; Murphy, Joe; Schober, Michael F.; Buskirk, Trent D.; Hunter Childs, Jennifer; Langer Tesfaye, Casey (2014). Public Opinion Quarterly78(4), 779-787 [LINK] [request]

Pragmatic processes in survey interviewing

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F.; Schwarz, Norbert (2014). In Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 420-437 [LINK] [request]

How much do jazz players share understanding of their performance? A case study

Schober, Michael F.; Spiro, Neta (2013). International Symposium on Performance Science [LINK]

Self-deceptive speech: A psycholinguistic view

Schober, Michael F.; Glick, Peter J. (2011). In Personality and psychopathology: Critical dialogues with David Shapiro (pp. 183-200). New York: Springer. [LINK] [request]

Does being together for years help comprehension?

Schober, Michael F.; Carstensen, Laura L. (2010). In Expressing oneself/Expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity Psychology Press [LINK] [request]

Spatial dialogue between partners with mismatched abilities

Schober, Michael F. (2009). Spatial dialogue between partners with mismatched abilities. In Spatial language and dialogue, Oxford University Press (pp. 23-39) [LINK] [request]

Envisioning the survey interview of the future

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F. (eds). (2007). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [LINK]

Bringing features of human dialogue to web surveys

Conrad, Frederick G.; Coiner, Tania; Schober, Michael F. (2007). Applied Cognitive Psychology21(2), 165-187 [LINK] [request]

Survey interviews and new communication technologies

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2007). Surve interviews and new communication technologies. In Envisioning the survey interview of the future., (pp. 1-30). [LINK] [request]

Modeling speech disfluency to predict conceptual misalignment in speech survey interfaces

Ehlen, Patrick; Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2007). Discourse Processes44(3), 245-265 [LINK] [request]

Cues of communication difficulty in telephone interviews

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F.; Dijkstra, Wil (2007). In Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 212-230). [LINK] [request]

Dialogue and interaction

Schober, Michael F. (2006). In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition (pp. 564-571). Oxford: Elsevier. [LINK] [request]

Conceptual alignment in conversation

Schober, Michael F. (2005). In Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 239-252). New York: Guilford Press. [LINK] [request]

Promoting uniform question understanding in today’s and tomorrow’s surveys

Conrad, Frederick G.; Schober, Michael F. (2005). Journal of Official Statistics 21(2) [LINK]

Attitudes and comprehension of terms in opinion questions about euthanasia

O’Hara, Maile, & Schober, Michael F. (2004). The New School Psychology Bulletin, 2(2), 11-29. [LINK]

Misunderstanding standardized language in research interviews

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G.; Fricker, Scott S. (2004). Applied Cognitive Psychology18(2), 169-188. [LINK] [request]

Discourse cues that respondents have misunderstood survey questions

Schober, Michael F.; Bloom, Jonathan E. (2004). Discourse Processes38(3), 287-308. [LINK] [request]

How web surveys differ from other kinds of user interfaces

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G.; Ehlen, Patrick; Fricker, Scott S. (2003). Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods [LINK]

Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner

Schober, Michael F.; Brennan, Susan E. (2003). In Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [LINK] [request]

A collaborative view of standardized survey interviews

Schober, Michael F.; Conrad, Frederick G. (2002). In Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (pp. 67-94). New York: John Wiley & Sons. [LINK] [request]